I’ll start by saying I am a parent and not a teacher.
I was at my 8th graders parent/teacher conferences last week. I was surprised to hear from the Language Arts teacher that their current project involved written analysis of short stories selected from a list, and that listening to an audiobook of the story was an option (not an accommodation, an option offered to everyone) as an alternative to actually having the student read the material. I must have given a look when she said that because the teacher seemed to double back and explain that since it wasn’t supposed to be a test of reading ability, she didn’t want students to get hung up on the reading.
At a time when students struggle with reading fluency, does it seem totally backwards to let students out of having to read, with the explanation given that some students struggle to read? I have heard that “students first learn to read, then they read to learn” - is this no longer considered valid?
Submitted October 13, 2025 at 07:19AM by earthdogmonster https://ift.tt/TDAo5pV