After a debate with a friend over there not being enough programs to help the under-educated and economically disadvantaged achieve higher learning, I had a few questions regarding the ideas I put forth in that debate.
How financially feasible would it be for states to fully subsidize GED classes and tests for those who do not have but wish to get the equivalent of a high school diploma? (for those who fall below a certain income level)
How financially feasible would it be for states to fully subsidize a low-income student's attempts at remedial classes taught at community colleges that are intended to bring a student's skill levels in math, reading, and writing up to college-ready levels?
How financially feasible would it be for states to issue a small grant (usable at in-state, public two year colleges) to students who pass those remedial classes in order to be eligible to take college-level courses?
Also, what about the feasibility of giving students in-county qualifications if the in-state, public two-year college they wish to attend is out of county but still the closest option to their current residence?
How financially feasible would it be for a program to be set up that, after achieving the core curriculum or Associate's Degree from an in-state, public two year college, would cut tuition for that student at a public university in the same state by 10% for the next sixty credit hours?
(These ideas are simply ideas. I am quite sure that there would be flaws with these ideas that I'm not currently thinking of - I'm not a genius after all. They're not meant to be "This is what needs to be done" statements.)
Submitted February 21, 2017 at 02:06PM by FindraGaming http://ift.tt/2mjfQFH
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario