I wrote this article arguing my point about how school should be changed in order to benefit the children. The vast majority of what is taught at higher levels in school provides little to no value for most all children in these classes. Even the business-man doesn't need biology or chemistry, let alone those who do menial labor or trade work.
The idealism of educating is harming children who could be using their time in a much more productive manner that would actually benefit them by provide them with a pragmatic education that would prepare them for whatever field of work they intend to do. School is largely wasteful because it teaches children things they don't actually need to know, especially at higher levels.
Education is only situationally useful, but rather than educate children with respect to whatever work situation they end up in, general education forces endless wasted hours of education upon children that amounts to little more than the knowledge of fun facts in their functional working lives, and that is only if the children actually learn the material to begin with.
Education is failing the students because it's a completely irrational and inefficient way to educate children. When you try to teach children things they don't need to know, clearly you're going to encounter the same resistance that an adult would give you if you try to teach them something of make them do something that provides no value to them with respect to their functional existence.
This is an essay I wrote that touches upon the topic, but feel free to argue your stance even if you don't want to read it.
Submitted November 22, 2019 at 11:33AM by marzipanmaddox https://ift.tt/37xPJD5
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario