My name is Claire and I’m currently a sophomore in highschool who is exponentially concerned with the rise of anti-intellectualism within the United States. More specifically, within our very own public education system.
Anti-intellectualism can be defined as the general opposition towards, distrust, and/or denial of intellectual practices and pursuits. However, why is it dangerous? It’s important that it is first understood what intellectual practices and pursuits are. An intellectual practice or pursuit can be defined as any and all things that require logic, reasoning, and research. This definition encompasses STEAM, which stands for “Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, and Mathematics”, literature, philosophy, etc.
The blatant denial of science and the banning of literature is ever growing. According to PEN America, there were approximately 10,046 titles that were banned from public schools within the 2023-2024 school year. Examples include but are not limited to: •“The Handmaids Tale” Authored by Margaret Atwood. This book was banned due its depiction of sexual violence, critique of religious extremism, and its feminist themes. •”The Holy Bible(King James Version)” This book was banned because of concerns about it being suitable for younger audiences. •”1984” Authored by George Orwell. This book was banned because of its portrayal of a totalitarian government, depictions of censorship, explicit sexual content, and ‘pro communist content’ •”Fahrenheit 451” Authored by Ray Bradbury. This book was banned due its criticism of censorship, using God’s name in vain, and profanity.
A common theme you may notice in most of these books is the critique of totalitarianism and fascism. These books being banned is clearly censoring these critiques from minors in schools.
Another book that has been banned is “Night” which is a Holocaust memoir authored by Elie Wiesel. It’s been banned in school districts due to concerns about it being too graphic to be taught in public schools.
This banning of books may as well function as the banning of knowledge and differing opinions. In books of literary merit, many people find that those books provoke new thoughts, awarenesses, and systems of thinking. This is similar to the censorship and denial of scientific fact.
Anti-intellectualism is so inexcusably rampant that it provokes dangerous denialism from top government officials. Entities such as the CDC, FDA, and WHO have been long-time supporters of vaccines and vaccine mandates. According to the National Foundation for Infectious Diseases, “Since 1924 childhood vaccinations have prevented more than 100 million cases of serious disease”. In contrast to these facts, top government officials such as Donald Trump or Robert F. Kennedy jr., have expressed their distrust (a common theme in anti-intellectualism) in the science behind vaccines. When asked during a press conference in a Mar-a-Lago, President Trump stated “I don’t like mandates, I’ve not a big mandate person” when asked about whether or not schools should mandate vaccines. Secretary Robert F. Kennedy jr. is a known critic and skeptic of vaccines. During his confirmation hearing, RFK jr repeatedly asked to see the science behind vaccines. When presented with the facts, he was nothing short of dismissive.
With evidence of anti-intellectualism being on the rise within our public policy, it begs the question of what is the point of trying to stop it? Why is anti-intellectualism dangerous?
The danger of anti-intellectualism is that it leads to willful ignorance because so many people fear knowing what they do not. Willful ignorance may be more impactful than knowledge, for it is more reckless. When we ignore science and censor things we don’t agree with it is impossible to move forward. When we dabble in things we refuse to understand, it turns into a mosaic of our own design that we cannot decipher the meaning of. Intellectualism, which is inherently tied to intellectual pursuits, has lead to groundbreaking inventions like the lightbulb, wifi, the Schaffer Paragraph, steam engines, and so much more. This alone is evidence that anti-intellectualism will, undoubtedly, slow us down. That is the danger of anti-intellectualism.
Submitted February 28, 2025 at 11:43PM by Affectionate-Bat8901 https://ift.tt/1zNRGVF