It’s not fair how an honest human work scored lower than a ChatGPT printed work. For context, I have this assignment which my peers printed his work entirely from ChatGPT an hour ago before the due date and scored like full marks while my work that I did only using ChatGPT sort of like tools scored lower. I read my peers work and I could tell without a doubt it’s 100% printed from ChatGPT. The format, content and the English. How is this fair? I was told to not use ChatGPT since the uni made it a rule that for any work submitted, has to be submitted to turnitin. Do the lecturers just not care what’s ChatGPT and what’s not?
Submitted October 13, 2024 at 02:01AM by CHiA-ZS https://ift.tt/YfnVTjb
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario