A 16 years old student, her assignment is due tomorrow. As a part of her assignment, she was supposed to spend at least a week researching about the subject assigned to her and prepare a manual report as a result. But alas, Now she's barely floating above water. Time to use ChatGPT.
A student, 21 years old now, as a part of the curriculum, there's a project she is supposed to build on domain of her choice and submit it to the University.
A 22 years old graduate with a resume looking for jobs, a recruiter studies her Resume and wonders if any of these projects are her own or a product of AI?
For someone who doesn't know who exactly to show or what domain to pick, ChatGPT looks like the only resort.
With this story, what I'm trying to suggest is - how many of projects/repositories in GitHub can be called your own?
How many portfolios are actually a hand-made result and how many a product of ChatGPT? (or any AI for that matter)
How are we going to tackle this? Is it really hindering the learning curve of a student? Are AIs really making a student's life easier by literally doing all of their work in minutes? Is this really a problem? Or time for the Education System to change/adapt to the evolving nature of AI and the students' role with it.
Thoughts?
Submitted May 18, 2025 at 06:36AM by Smart-wookie9 https://ift.tt/AvQGRqX
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario