This thing is hard to explain without an example: imagine the student x has a question about an History figure. and student y has a question about another History figure. Both of these figures were candidates for an important election, and the teacher has an idea: She pauses both questions, and makes a new one. "which one of them was elected president?" the whole class starts arguing with her and while they are at it, she leaves to write something in two versions. When she's finished, she returns and asks "who thinks its x, raise their hand" and to each one of them she hands paper A, and to who didnt she hands paper B. "the class is over, bring those papers to the next classes, and dont bring your manual next class"-she says. the kids are happy to leave sooner but they are confused about their paper: it has questions about the especific History figure but according to where they are having the class. Next class is Math and they see the History teacher about to leave that classroom. One of the kids think "Maybe she's telling him to do the same!". But no, the class goes normally, and at the end, he asks them to complete some equations in the paper. Easy to some students, harder to others, independent of the version. What they didnt know is that both Paper A and B have three versions (6 total) of that equation. All similar but with different results where only some are relevant to the next History class. Spanish class is next, and the same happens, in the end they have to complete a couple of creative decoding exercises from Spanish to English. Student x even has his question answered. Next Accompanied Studies class (idk if that's how that class is translated in other countries) the kids seem ok to have a debate about all classes. "But it doesnt make sense to the History teacher..."-one of them says "...we get normal classes with the teachers, but with her, she only advances one of our questions at a time. " The student was right, the teacher eventually got fired for having her job easier, and giving it to other teachers.
At home she starts thinking, after a discussion with her husband about what to do next: Stubborn to her idea she wonders what if she gives particular lessons to kids of multiple schools (different manuals) where one manual is told to the students to have a virus with wrong information (but there's no need to actually make that virus, it would be just an uncertain detail in History, to keep the students never sure of something) And with that uncertainty she tries her tricks again but more directly this time. But this time, her work is going to be hard at start, because she doesnt know the teachers plan. Only with the students annotations, she needs to create combos in history moments, wait for them to have questions about it, and almost daily, create custom exercises to each student, every class. The husband sees that she is getting more and more tired, trying to find the history moments to pause and she tells him "there's this guy, (me, the actual writter) he grew without the next step of this project (if the project succeded in the school, there was still this one more step) and he ended having a mental overload that he doesnt want to see repeated in anyone again. My point is...The writter needs someone that could be me, while he needs to grow a petition for the insertion of this idea into schools"; the husband says "there's no way they'll let a teacher do that at a school. You got fired remember?"; " yeah, but not if they all share these combos in Accompanied Studies, to the responsible teacher"; "I still dont get very well the idea, what's the next step, if you were still there? the step that helps him so much?"-he asks "it's not a big deal to me, but to him, the writter, in a way that clears some unwelcome mentalities in the youth's brain, the next step is simply getting safely lost in What Ifs, with the kids that were with the wrong versions inserting (possibly and preferably) the Religion Ed class inside Accompanied Studies, where he was and is willing to believe that we, while kids, should learn how to wait, or be at least open minded to it, considering our Savior's sacrifice for us. He could give you more details about it"
Submitted November 05, 2021 at 02:24PM by Savings_Wedding_8624 https://ift.tt/3bIYk9o
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario